![]() If you are positive, you need to warn your sex partners, so that they can make their own informed decisions.” "Usher, if you are negative, please say so. "I am doing this so that he does not do this to anyone else," she said, urging the singer to reveal his status. But she claimed there are "others" who do but are too embarrassed to say so publicly. ![]() Usher's four-page response to the Sharpton lawsuit is his first official statement about the case since Sharpton and her lawyer, Lisa Bloom, announced their pursuit of the singer (full name Usher Raymond IV) for allegedly not disclosing an STD diagnosis prior to sexual contact.Ĭalifornia law says that individuals who know they have an STD are guilty of a misdemeanor if they do not disclose their status to partners before engaging in sexual acts.Īt a press conference last month, Sharpton said she does not have herpes. The lawsuit should be dismissed, Usher argues, "because any harm that any plaintiff alleges to have suffered was caused in whole or in part by that plaintiff's own negligence." He does not specify the nature of the alleged negligence. Usher asserted that he "was not the cause of any alleged harm" suffered by the plaintiffs and that the plaintiffs "assumed the risk" of any alleged harm. ![]() "Plaintiffs are barred from recovery for alleged willful conduct by Defendant because any alleged conduct by Defendant, which is expressly denied, was unintentional," the singer's response says. His reasons include legal technicalities, such as the statute of limitations, lack of standing by plaintiffs, the improper joining of plaintiffs in one suit, insufficient facts, and failure to meet legal standards.īut the singer also argues that any of his alleged conduct was "unintentional," and that the plaintiffs themselves have "unclean hands." That's a legal doctrine meaning a plaintiff is not entitled to a remedy because the plaintiff has acted unethically or in bad faith in some way. Usher is seeking to have their lawsuit dismissed, citing a "general denial" of its allegations and 13 more specific reasons why he claims the suit has no merit. Usher's lawyers on Tuesday filed an answer to a lawsuit brought last month in Los Angeles Superior Court by Quantasia Sharpton and an unnamed man and unnamed woman who claim to have been Usher's sexual partners. The plaintiff successfully sued Usher as California law makes it illegal for people to knowingly and recklessly transmit an STD.Usher has responded for the first time to accusations he exposed sex partners to genital herpes, filing a legal document containing a broad denial without actually specifying whether he has or had the sexually transmitted disease. Neither Grace nor Tameka are believed to have the disease. He wed his long term-girlfriend Grace Miguel in 2015. Usher allegedly paid around R35,000 for her medical bills between 20. She said in court papers that she was later diagnosed with herpes, and developed vaginal sores. The plaintiff says when she questioned the 38-year-old about a "greenish discharge", he claimed it was "nothing" and it had cleared up. The Daily Mail reports he contracted the infection around the time he was finalising his divorce with Tameka Foster, who accused him of cheating. II' singer allegedly contracted the sexually transmitted disease (STD) between 20. He allegedly had to pay his former lover, who is a celebrity stylist, $1.1-million (over R14-million) in December 2012.Īccording to court documents published by Radar Online, the 'Confessions, Pt. ![]() The musician reportedly settled a lawsuit involving a woman who claimed he did not disclose that he had herpes, and had unprotected sex with her. Usher was trending on Twitter this week for an unexpected reason. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |